The Amazon Alexa class action lawsuit is now considered by many to be a major legal challenge for the e-commerce giant after a federal judge allowed claims over alleged secret recordings to proceed.
In the July 7, 2025, court ruling of U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik, the judge ruled that Alexa device owners with registered accounts may pursue their claims together as a class. The lawsuit accuses the tech company of violating privacy rights by recording and storing private conversations without consent.
Background of the Lawsuit
The case, Kaeli Garner, et al. v. Amazon.com Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-00750, was filed in 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Plaintiffs allege that Alexa-enabled devices “illegally and surreptitiously” captured conversations, sometimes even when users did not say a wake word like “Alexa.”
They argue that the company stored these voice recordings and related transcripts without disclosure, allegedly creating a significant Alexa privacy lawsuit under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and several state wiretapping statutes.
Amazon has denied wrongdoing, insisting its devices are built to activate only after intentional prompts. The company maintains that accidental triggers are rare and that safeguards prevent improper data retention.
However, the plaintiffs claim that recordings were sometimes reviewed by employees and used for business purposes.
The Court’s July 2025 Ruling
Judge Lasnik’s ruling allowed class certification for registered Alexa users but denied it for non-registrants. The distinction came down to whether privacy expectations could be evaluated on a group level.
For those who registered their Alexa devices, the court found the central question clear: did Amazon record users when it should not have? As all registrants share that same legal question, they can proceed collectively.
By contrast, claims from non-registrants—such as visitors, family members, or others in proximity to someone else’s Alexa device— allegedly required too much individualized inquiry. For example, the court noted it would be more complex to determine whether a person expected privacy in a household or a guest setting. As a result, these individuals are not currently part of the certified class.
This decision narrowed the scope of the Amazon Alexa device privacy case but confirmed that likely millions of registered owners are now eligible participants.
Plaintiffs’ Claims and Legal Grounds
The Alexa privacy lawsuit alleges that Amazon collected, stored, and in some cases shared recordings without user consent. Plaintiffs argue that Alexa devices captured audio beyond intentional use, such as when no wake word was spoken. They claim these practices violate the CPA and various state wiretap laws.
The Amazon Alexa class action lawsuit seeks two main forms of relief:
- Injunctive relief, which could force Amazon to stop recording conversations without consent and destroy existing audio files and transcripts.
- Damages, which may include significant statutory penalties. For example, California law provides $5,000 per violation, while other states authorize $100 per day or a minimum of $1,000 per unlawful recording.
The plaintiffs also assert that Amazon’s alleged failure to disclose design choices, such as preferences for “over-recording” and the retention of transcripts, deprived users of control over their data, causing measurable harm.
Amazon’s Response
Amazon has consistently denied the allegations, and Reuters reported that the company argued that the discovery process showed no evidence that recordings were improperly exploited or stored against company policy. The company maintains that Alexa devices activate only when prompted and that safeguards minimize false activations.
The defense also pointed to a “do-not-save recordings” feature introduced in September 2020, which allows users to prevent the storage of their audio history. Plaintiffs countered that this feature was introduced only after years of data collection and did not apply retroactively.
Additionally, plaintiffs estimate that Alexa devices misfired at least once per month, allegedly capturing unintended conversations despite these safeguards.
What Happens Next
With class certification granted, the lawsuit will proceed toward trial unless the parties reach an agreement beforehand. Possible outcomes may include injunctive orders, monetary damages, or an Alexa class action settlement. Amazon may also pursue appeals of the certification decision.
The next phase will involve more extensive discovery, expert testimony, and arguments over the scope of damages. For now, registered Alexa users form a unified class, with the opportunity to pursue claims against the e-commerce giant’s privacy practices in federal court.
Wrapping Up
Judge Robert Lasnik’s ruling has allowed millions of Alexa users with registered devices to move forward together in the Amazon Alexa class action lawsuit. While non-registrant claims remain excluded, the case highlights serious questions about privacy, consumer rights, and the handling of Amazon Alexa conversation recording in modern households.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The lawsuit centers on allegations that Alexa-enabled devices recorded private conversations without user consent. Plaintiffs claim these recordings occurred even when no wake word was used and that Amazon stored or shared the data.
Judge Robert Lasnik ruled that only registered Alexa device owners are included in the certified class. Non-registrants, such as household guests or individuals who spoke near someone else’s device, were excluded because their privacy expectations require individualized review.
Plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages. Under state wiretapping laws, damages could include $5,000 per violation in California or $100 per day of unauthorized recording in states like Florida and Maryland. Plaintiffs also want Amazon to delete any existing recordings and related transcripts tied to the alleged violations.
Amazon denies wrongdoing and argues that Alexa devices only record after intentional prompts. The company points to safeguards such as a “do-not-save recordings” option introduced in September 2020. Plaintiffs counter that this feature came too late and did not prevent earlier recordings, keeping the dispute at the center of the Alexa voice recording lawsuit.
Add Comment