Imagine booking a hotel room advertised at $150 per night, but your bill shows $192 when you check out. 

That extra $42 may have been a mandatory resort fee, adding 11% to your hotel cost (national average). Some hotels may charge over $100 per night in these hidden fees, sometimes exceeding the advertised room rate.

Currently, attorneys general from Texas, Nebraska, DC, and dozens of other states are taking major hotel chains to court over these alleged deceptive pricing practices. 

Class action attorneys are also building cases against hotels that charge mandatory fees for amenities their customers never used.

If you've paid resort fees for closed pools, unavailable equipment, or services that should be free, you might soon have a claim.

Why Are Resort Fees Under Investigation?

Resort fees go by many names—destination fees, facility fees, amenity fees, urban fees—but they all function similarly.

Hotels add these mandatory charges to your nightly rate, supposedly covering amenities like:

• Wi-Fi and phone calls
• Gym and pool access
• Beach chairs and umbrellas
• Parking and shuttle services
• Daily newspapers and coffee
• Bicycle rentals and fitness classes

The investigation centers on a simple question: What happens when you pay for these amenities but can't use them?

Attorneys investigating hotel hidden charges have uncovered examples of alleged fraudulent misrepresentation. Facilities with 500 rooms might have only 10 bikes available. Properties charge for gym access when fitness centers are closed. Guests pay for pool privileges during maintenance shutdowns.

According to class action attorneys, the financial impact hits hard when hotels unjustly enrich themselves for services not rendered. At $42.41 per night on average, a week-long stay allegedly adds nearly $300 in mandatory fees. And some luxury resorts have pushed these charges even higher. Fisher Island Hotel & Resort in Miami alledgedly adds $107 nightly, while some Las Vegas properties exceed $160 per night in mandatory resort fees.

Hotel Chains Face Multi-State Attorney General Lawsuits

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton leads the charge against major hotel chains. His office filed separate lawsuits against Marriott, Hilton, and Hyatt Hotels, alleging violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Each case highlights how these companies allegedly deceive consumers through hidden fees and misleading advertising.

Nebraska's attorney general settled with Hilton after similar allegations, while the District of Columbia continues litigation against Marriott. The coordinated investigation involves all 50 state attorneys general, signaling unprecedented legal pressure on the hotel industry.

Specific allegations vary by chain but follow patterns. Marriott faces claims about displaying low initial rates and then adding fees late in the booking process. Hilton's lawsuit centers on properties like the Hilton Anatole in Dallas, where a $193 room jumps to $220 after a "Daily Mandatory Charge." Hyatt Hotels allegedly masks fees within "Taxes and Fees" sections, misleading guests about government-imposed charges versus hotel-imposed costs.

The Federal Trade Commission also joined the fight, implementing new junk fee rules in December 2024. These regulations target "bait-and-switch pricing" and require hotels to disclose total costs upfront.

How Hotels Hide Mandatory Fees Through Drip Pricing

Hotel drip pricing works like a carefully orchestrated deception. 

You search for rooms, compare prices, and select what appears to be the best deal. But mandatory fees appear only after entering personal information and reaching the final booking screen.

• REAL EXAMPLE: The Hilton Anatole Hotel allegedly displays a $193 nightly rate during initial searches. But deep in the checkout process, a $27.26 "Daily Mandatory Charge" materializes. This fee supposedly covers Wi-Fi, gym access, spa discounts, breakfast for children, and two water bottles—items that Hilton Honors members already receive free.

This practice makes price comparison nearly impossible. You'd naturally choose the cheaper option when one hotel shows $150 and another shows $193. But if that $150 room includes a $50 resort fee, you're actually paying more.

The Federal Trade Commission warned hotels about these tactics in 2012, stating that advertised prices must include all mandatory fees.

Yet the practice persists, allegedly generating hundreds of millions in revenue for hotel chains while frustrating consumers trapped by the booking process.

Real Guest Complaints Drive Class Action Litigation

Consumer experiences fuel the growing resort fee investigation. Real guests have shared evidence with class action attorneys that includes:

• A 4,000-guest resort with one tennis court charges everyone for "complimentary court time."
• Hotels bill for bike rentals but have insufficient bikes for even 1% of guests.
• Properties charge dry cleaning fees for one-night stays with 24-hour turnaround times.
• Gym access fees continue during equipment repairs and facility closures.

Restaurant vouchers come with amenity fees, but the dining facility has no reservations available.

One Reddit user complained: "I arrived late, left early, and they charged me 65 dollars in 'resort fees' which included the use of the gym, which was closed, and Wi-Fi, which I never used."

Another traveler reported paying destination fees for afternoon activities only available when guests couldn't participate—after checkout and before check-in. According to Frommers, Vegas visitors may pay over $100 resort fees even when amenities are closed, and hotels may refuse to issue a refund.

These aren't isolated incidents. Thousands of similar complaints drive class action litigation forward, as attorneys document charging patterns for genuinely unavailable conveniences.

Legal Theories Behind Hotel Resort Fee Litigation

When hotels advertise one price but charge another, they may violate basic truth-in-advertising requirements.

Resort fee litigation primarily rests on three legal foundations. State consumer protection laws prohibit deceptive trade practices—the cornerstone of most attorney general lawsuits. 

Breach of contract claims arise when hotels charge for specific amenities but fail to provide them. The hotel breaches the agreement if your resort fee includes bike rentals but no bikes exist. The same applies to closed facilities, unavailable services, or amenities requiring additional payment.

The Federal Trade Commission Act addresses unfair business practices affecting interstate commerce. Hotel chains operating across state lines fall under federal jurisdiction when using systematic deceptive pricing.

Perhaps the most deceptive practice occurs when hotels label fees within "Taxes and Fees" sections. This practice improperly suggests government-imposed charges when hotels actually pocket the money.

State attorneys particularly target this mislabeling as fraudulent misrepresentation.

How Consumers Can Join the Resort Fee Investigation

Taking action against illegal resort fees typically starts with documentation.

Save every piece of evidence:

• Screenshot of initial advertised rates before fees appear.
• Photograph booking confirmations showing when the proprietor discloses fees.
• Document closed or unavailable amenities with photos and timestamps.
• Keep all receipts showing resort fees charged.
• Note specific amenities you couldn't access despite paying fees.

File complaints with your state attorney general's consumer protection division. These agencies investigate patterns of deceptive practices and pursue cases based on consumer reports. 

Sharing your experience helps build stronger cases against hotel chains. The more documentation you provide, the better attorneys can demonstrate systematic fraud rather than isolated incidents.

Future Hotel Pricing Reform Lies Ahead

The resort fee investigation may represent a turning point in travel industry practices. With attorneys general from 50 states coordinating efforts, major hotel chains face unprecedented pressure to reform pricing structures. 

Whether through state lawsuits, federal regulations, or class action litigation, the era of deceptive hotel pricing may soon end. The question isn't whether hotels will change these practices, but how quickly consumer protection laws will force transparency across the industry.