nav-logo
  • Home
  • Lawsuits & Settlementsdropdown
    • Type of Lawsuits
  • Class Action News
  • About Us
footer-logo

Lawsuits & Settlements

View All SettlementsLatest Class Action NewsAbout Us

Subscribe

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on cases and settlements.

error

Failed To Sign Up

Please enter your email address below

success-modal

Thanks for Subscribing!

Thanks for signing up. We'll send you className action news, updates and trending lawsuits to keep you up-to-date.

By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy and provide consent to receive updates from our company.

© 2024 OnlyClassActions. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

Cookie Consent

FacebookInstagramTwitter
social media addiction lawsuit​

social media addiction lawsuit

Hold social media companies accountable. If you have been diagnosed with Anxiety, Depression, or an Eating Disorder, you may be entitled to compensation.

  • Personal Injury Lawsuits

Last Update

  • May 13, 2025
lawsuitlike
lawsuitlike
lawsuitlike

social media addiction lawsuit Updates
image_line

Court Upholds Therapist-Patient Privilege in Social Media MDL

Magistrate Judge Peter Kang denied defendants' request to access therapy records in the Social Media MDL, siding with plaintiffs on a key privilege issue. The court rejected an in-camera review of two documents previously clawed back under therapist-patient privilege, ruling they were irrelevant to the litigation’s central claims. Applying Illinois law, Judge Kang found no basis to override the privilege, emphasizing that the records did not relate to allegations of social media addiction or harm. This decision protects plaintiffs’ mental health confidentiality and shields survivors and families from intrusive, unrelated discovery tactics during litigation.

05/06/25

Court Shields Victims’ Therapy Records in Social Media MDL

Magistrate Judge Peter Kang ruled in favor of plaintiffs, denying defendants’ request to access privileged therapy records in the Social Media Addiction MDL. The dispute centered on two documents initially produced but later retracted under therapist-patient privilege. Defendants sought an in-camera review, arguing the records could be pivotal to their defense, but the court rejected this motion. Applying Illinois law, Judge Kang found no legal justification to breach confidentiality, ruling the documents irrelevant to core claims and failing to meet the “fundamental fairness” exception. The decision safeguards victims’ mental health privacy, ensuring litigation doesn’t force undue exposure of sensitive therapy sessions. This reinforces protections for survivors and families, allowing them to seek justice without compromising personal confidentiality.

05/06/25

Meta-GO-Biz Agreement on Document Disclosure Raises Transparency Concerns

Meta and California’s Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) submitted a stipulation outlining terms for limited document production concerning tax credits and grants awarded to social media companies, including Snap. The stipulation reveals close coordination between Meta and GO-Biz, with confidentiality measures and redactions shaping what is disclosed. Although Meta contests GO-Biz’s legal stance on disclosure limits, both appear aligned in controlling the release of sensitive information. This cooperation may weaken the state’s credibility in public enforcement actions, but for individual plaintiffs, it reinforces claims that both corporate and government entities failed to protect young users.

05/05/25

Meta and California Agency Coordinate on Limited Document Disclosure

Meta and California’s GO-Biz agency have agreed to a stipulation governing limited document production related to state tax credits and grants awarded to tech companies, including Snap. The agreement outlines confidentiality terms and redactions, with both parties closely managing disclosures. Although Meta disputes GO-Biz’s legal stance on withholding certain materials, the collaboration has raised concerns about transparency. Critics argue this cooperation may undermine the credibility of government-led lawsuits. However, for individual plaintiffs, the focus remains on Meta’s platform design, targeting practices, and failure to warn—factors that are independent of any state involvement.

04/17/25

About The Social Media Addiction Lawsuit

Nowadays, everyone participates in social media to one degree or another. However, the question of how much is too much has been raised. When does the impact cause severe psychological and physical conditions due to overuse? The core issue of the social media addiction class action lawsuit centers on the potential dangers that may occur from prolonged social media use. It especially focuses on how social media negatively harms young individuals.

 

Certain studies and reports have shown that excessive screen time can lead to mental health disorders and other serious problems. This is especially true for those younger than 24 who spend an excessive amount of time on social media platforms and show signs of psychological and physical harm.

 

Many people are unaware of the risks of excessive social media use and continue to suffer in silence. However, legal options are now available for those struggling to cope with social media addiction and its side effects. Individuals can now join the lawsuit and seek potential compensation for the harm caused by social media addiction.

 

If you or a loved one has suffered serious health issues related to social media use, you must understand your rights. You may be able to participate in a social media addiction lawsuit to seek justice and compensation. 

Who Qualifies for the Social Media Addiction Lawsuit?

While a lawyer will need to evaluate your case and see if you may qualify, individuals seeking to participate in a social media addiction lawsuits typically meet the following criteria:

  • You have used social media more than three hours per day.
  • Proof of extensive social media use before the age of 24.
  • Provide proof of treatment of conditions and injuries associated with social media use.

 

In addition, one or more of the following psychological or physical conditions have been asserted in these suits:

  • Eating Disorder
  • Anxiety
  • Depression Disorders
  • Suicidal tendencies or suicide attempts 

 

If these factors apply to you, you may be entitled to compensation. We encourage you to seek legal advice to determine your eligibility.
 

Which Companies Are Involved in Social Media Addiction Lawsuits?

Several social media companies have been implicated in the social media addiction lawsuit. Currently, major platforms face allegations that their algorithms and features contribute to addictive behaviors and serious health conditions. These lawsuits claim that the companies behind these platforms failed to warn users about the potential health risks of excessive social media use, particularly for young users.

 

As more evidence emerges linking prolonged social media use to severe psychological and physical harm, the number of cases against these companies will likely increase.

 

If you or a loved one have experienced adverse health effects due to social media addiction, you may qualify to join the class action lawsuit.

How Much Compensation Should You Expect?

Determining a typical settlement amount in a social media addiction lawsuit is challenging because many things can impact the case. Factors such as the severity of the condition, the strength of the evidence, jury decisions, and the lawyers' skill all influence the settlement amount.

 

As of now, the social media addiction lawsuits are in the early stages, and no global settlements or jury trials have occurred. However, based on other litigation involving similar cases, a lawyer can provide you with potential settlement amounts based on the type and extent of harm suffered by the plaintiffs.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

In these class action lawsuits, lawyers typically represent you on a contingency fee basis. This implies that if the case is successful, the attorneys' fees will be deducted from the class action settlement or judgment rather than being paid up front.

The specific requirements listed in the class definition govern who can join a class action lawsuit. These requirements are frequently connected to using a product, working for a specific company, or being exposed to a specific environmental factor for a predetermined amount of time.

Participating in a class action lawsuit can lower legal expenses, expedite the courtroom proceedings, and offer relief in situations where individual claims might be too minor to pursue on their own. Additionally, it guarantees that each class member will be represented and able to gain from a single verdict or settlement.

The length of when you’ll receive your settlement from the time you submit your inquiry can vary. Typically this process can take up to two years but in some cases, It may take longer.

This is an advertisement. OnlyClassActions is not a law firm or referral service, and we do not provide legal advice. OnlyClassActions provides a free service for individuals seeking legal representation, and we do not charge you to be connected with an attorney. We do not recommend or endorse any attorneys that pay to participate. OnlyClassActions utilizes a pool of attorneys in each jurisdiction, and attorneys are selected through a round-robin process without our evaluating your legal situation when selecting which attorney will receive your information. OnlyClassActions makes no representation about the quality of legal services or the qualifications of any attorney participating in our pool. Information you submit will be shared with third-party attorney(s). An attorney-client relationship is not formed when you submit information through the form. Hiring a lawyer is a critical decision and should not be predicated solely on comments, advertisements, or other content found on any website. You are under no obligation to retain a lawyer who contacts you through this service.

Add Comment




Search icon

Related Lawsuits