PFAS Lawsuit
Forever Chemicals found in tap water! You may qualify for compensation if you have been diagnosed with Testicular Cancer, Kidney Cancer, Ulcerative Cancer, or Liver Cancer.
PFAS Lawsuit Updates
Nationwide AFFF Lawsuit Targets Major Chemical Manufacturers
A group of 50+ plaintiffs has filed suit in Alabama federal court against 3M, DuPont, Chemours, and Tyco, alleging long-term health injuries from PFAS exposure in Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF). The complaint accuses manufacturers of knowingly producing and distributing AFFF containing PFOA and PFOS, which contaminated water supplies and caused severe health issues. Legal claims include negligence, fraud, product liability, and nuisance. Originally filed in state court, the case was moved to federal jurisdiction after Tyco invoked the federal officer removal statute, claiming it produced AFFF under U.S. Defense Department specifications. Plaintiffs seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and punitive damages, citing exposure from both military and civilian AFFF use.
04/10/25
Judge Selects 12 Sites for Manufacturer Identification Test Cases
The MDL judge has designated 12 sites, primarily airports, fire stations, and training facilities across seven states, including Maryland, Florida, and Alaska, as test cases to help identify the manufacturers of PFAS-containing firefighting foam. These locations were selected due to the likelihood that they retain purchase records linking foam use to specific companies. The goal is to determine whether available documentation can trace contamination back to particular manufacturers. Establishing this connection is critical, as plaintiffs must prove which companies are responsible for the toxic exposure to proceed with claims for damages related to PFAS pollution.
04/03/25
Connecticut Family Joins PFAS Exposure Lawsuit
A West Haven, Connecticut, family has filed a lawsuit in the growing PFAS and AFFF multidistrict litigation, alleging their child developed ulcerative colitis and liver damage from prolonged exposure to toxic chemicals in firefighting foam and contaminated water. The complaint claims the child was diagnosed in 2022, with elevated liver enzymes detected in 2023, linking these conditions to PFAS exposure, including in utero. The lawsuit accuses manufacturers of negligence, product liability, and failure to warn, arguing they knowingly distributed harmful products without adequate warnings. The family seeks compensatory and punitive damages for the injuries sustained.
04/01/25
Judge Denies U.S. Government’s PFAS Dismissal Bid
A federal judge in South Carolina has rejected the U.S. government’s attempt to dismiss all PFAS-related lawsuits, ruling that site-specific facts must be evaluated before determining jurisdiction. Judge Richard M. Gergel found that jurisdictional disputes remain under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and CERCLA, allowing cases against the military for PFAS contamination—filed by communities, businesses, and state governments—to proceed. While some claims tied to Cannon Air Force Base were dismissed, claims alleging negligent handling of AFFF contamination at military sites remain active. This decision underscores the government’s potential accountability for operational failures involving toxic firefighting foam, paving the way for further site-specific claims and jurisdictional discovery.
02/28/25
About PFAS Lawsuits
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been widely used in a wide array of products since the 1950s. They are frequently found in non-stick cookware and even firefighting foams.
Government agencies have found PFAS in drinking water across the country from the chemical leeching into groundwater. Many people are being exposed without even knowing it.
Commonly known as “forever chemical”, the harmful effects of PFAS often take years to manifest but can lead to a variety of serious health conditions. In recent years, research has linked exposure to the chemical to certain cancers, thyroid disease, and immune system disorders.
Many people are unaware of the danger of exposure to PFAS and have failed to link their health issues to the toxic substances. However, legal avenues now exist for individuals who have been adversely impacted by PFAS exposure.
If you or a loved one is struggling to cope with health problems related to exposure to PFAS, there are legal options. You may be able to seek potential compensation for the harm caused by the hazardous chemicals.
Who Prequalifies for the PFAS Class Action Lawsuit?
To participate in a PFAS class action lawsuit, certain requirements must be met. You must meet criteria such as the following:
- Show proof of exposure to PFAS chemicals through tap water ingestion.
- Provide medical records documenting the diagnosis of a health condition linked to PFAS exposure, such as cancer, thyroid disease, or immune system disorders.
- Demonstrate that you have developed a health condition after significant exposure to PFAS.
You may also be eligible if you have been diagnosed with the following cancer(s):
- Testicular Cancer
- Kidney Cancer
- Ulcerative Cancer
- Liver Cancer
Please note: Exposure to contaminated tap water, the claimant must have consumed contaminated tap water with PFAS chemicals from 1990 to the present.
If you meet the above requirements, you may be entitled to compensation. Various factors impact eligibility, and all cases are unique.
Which Companies Are Involved in the PFAS Lawsuit?
Several companies have been implicated in the PFAS lawsuits. These companies, often involved in the manufacturing or use of PFAS chemicals, face allegations that they failed to warn the public about the dangers of PFAS exposure. The lawsuits claim that these companies were aware of the risks but continued to produce and use PFAS without proper safety measures.
Alarmingly, PFAS chemicals have been detected in tap water supplies across many communities in the United States. Families and individuals are facing widespread exposure through daily water use - often completely unaware of the dangers until they develop health problems.
Contaminated tap water has become a significant source of PFAS exposure, which may have long-term health ramifications.
As more evidence emerges linking PFAS exposure—especially from contaminated tap water—to severe health conditions, the number of cases against these companies will likely grow.
If you or a loved one has experienced health problems due to PFAS exposure, you may qualify to join the class action lawsuit.
How Much Compensation Should You Expect in Your PFAS Lawsuit?
Determining an exact settlement amount in a PFAS lawsuit is challenging because many factors directly impact each case. These factors include:
- The severity of the health condition,
- The extent of PFAS exposure
- Strength of the evidence presented.
The extent to which you've been exposed to PFAS through your tap water can greatly influence your case and potential settlement amount.
As of now, PFAS lawsuits are still in the early stages, and no global settlements or jury trials have taken place. However, based on a large pool of similar environmental contamination cases, potential settlement amounts can be anticipated based on the type and extent of harm suffered by each of the plaintiffs.
If you believe you’ve been affected by PFAS exposure through contaminated tap water, it’s important to act now. Contact us to learn more about your rights and whether you may qualify for the PFAS class action lawsuit.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The specific requirements listed in the class definition govern who can join a class action lawsuit. These requirements are frequently connected to using a product, working for a specific company, or being exposed to a specific environmental factor for a predetermined amount of time.
The length of when you’ll receive your settlement from the time you submit your inquiry can vary. Typically this process can take up to two years but in some cases, It may take longer.
The timeline for joining the lawsuit can differ depending on various factors, including the statute of limitations in your jurisdiction. It's best to consult a legal expert as soon as possible to determine your eligibility.
This is an advertisement. OnlyClassActions is not a law firm or referral service, and we do not provide legal advice. OnlyClassActions provides a free service for individuals seeking legal representation, and we do not charge you to be connected with an attorney. We do not recommend or endorse any attorneys that pay to participate. OnlyClassActions utilizes a pool of attorneys in each jurisdiction, and attorneys are selected through a round-robin process without our evaluating your legal situation when selecting which attorney will receive your information. OnlyClassActions makes no representation about the quality of legal services or the qualifications of any attorney participating in our pool. Information you submit will be shared with third-party attorney(s). An attorney-client relationship is not formed when you submit information through the form. Hiring a lawyer is a critical decision and should not be predicated solely on comments, advertisements, or other content found on any website. You are under no obligation to retain a lawyer who contacts you through this service.
Add Comment