Paragard IUD Lawsuit Updates
Paragard IUD Litigation Tops 3,700 Cases Ahead of 2026 Trials
As of December 2, 2025, the Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation encompasses 3,749 active lawsuits, reflecting an increase of 91 cases since November. This multidistrict litigation represents women who allege the copper intrauterine device fractured upon removal or while implanted, causing severe internal injuries. Specific complications cited include device embedment, organ perforation, and in extreme cases, surgical interventions such as hysterectomy. The litigation is progressing toward its first bellwether trials scheduled for early 2026. Women who experienced similar injuries from the Paragard IUD remain eligible to file claims and seek compensation.
Paragard MDL Grows to 3,749 Cases as Key 2026 Bellwether Trials Are Set
The multidistrict litigation (MDL) over alleged Paragard IUD fractures continues to expand, adding 91 new cases last month for a total of 3,749. Under Judge Leigh Martin May, the first in a series of critical bellwether test trials is scheduled for January 20, 2026, with subsequent trials set for March and May 2026. These trials will present evidence that a device defect causes the plastic arms to break upon removal, leading to severe injuries. The outcomes will be instrumental in shaping potential settlement values for the thousands of pending cases.
Federal Ruling Allows Warning Claims Against Paragard Manufacturer
U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May issued a ruling on claims involving Cooper Surgical and its Paragard IUD after the company sought case dismissals. In a November 2025 order, the court partially granted the request and deferred other issues. Judge May determined Cooper cannot be held liable for design defect claims because it did not design the IUDs used by plaintiffs at the time of implantation. However, the court allowed “failure to warn” claims to proceed, finding potential liability for insufficient risk disclosures. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have 10 days to submit evidence supporting trial on the failure-to-warn allegations.
Paragard IUD Litigation Grows as Thousands Allege Device Injuries
Thousands of women have filed lawsuits alleging the Paragard IUD causes severe complications, including device migration, fracture upon removal, and life-altering injuries such as uterine perforation. Currently, 3,658 cases are consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL). The plaintiffs uniformly claim the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about these risks. Women who have experienced similar injuries are advised to consult with a personal injury attorney to explore their legal options.
About The Paragard IUD Lawsuit
Thousands of women have filed lawsuits against Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical regarding the Paragard intrauterine device (IUD). Lawsuits allege the copper-based contraceptive resulted in serious injury to patients due to a suspected design flaw that causes it to break into pieces during removal.
Affected patients can suffer from infections, organ damage, internal bleeding, infertility, and even death. These devastating outcomes often result in significant pain and suffering, permanent damage, and further treatment or surgery to correct.
The lawsuits have been consolidated under multi-district litigation (MDL), allowing affected individuals to band together to hold these companies accountable. If you or a loved one was harmed by the Paragard IUD, you may be eligible to join the MDL. Read on to discover if you qualify and how to take the first steps today.
Paragard Concerns Fuel Recalls
Paragard is a t-shaped, copper IUD placed in the uterus to provide long-term contraception. As it uses copper rather than hormones to prevent pregnancy, Paragard is often suggested as a safer alternative to patients wishing to avoid hormonal birth control. In reality, the Paragard IUD is associated with a number of health risks, which have been linked to thousands of injuries and at least 17 deaths.
The Paragard lawsuit isn’t the first time the device’s safety has been called into question. Certain Paragard lot numbers were recalled in 2014 when tests indicated the affected devices might not be fully sterile. In 2019, the FDA reprimanded CooperSurgical for an ad that made false and misleading claims while neglecting to inform viewers of Paragard’s risks. The IUD was added to the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in 2021 after reports of device breakage increased.
What Is The Focus Of The Lawsuit?
Patients injured by the Paragard IUD hope to hold Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical accountable for their alleged negligence.
The Paragard IUD lawsuits include the following allegations:
- Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical neglected to inform patients and health providers about Paragard IUD risks.
- The companies created and sold a device with inherent design flaws that cause it to break upon removal, resulting in serious health complications.
Plaintiffs believe this negligence resulted in the injuries they and many others sustained while using Paragard and during device removal.
The Risks of Paragard
Device breakage is the basis of most of the Paragard IUD litigation. To remove the device from a patient’s uterus, a doctor must pull on the removal cord to bring the IUD out of the vaginal canal. Ideally, Paragard should come out in one piece, but it has broken upon removal in a concerning number of cases. When this happens, plastic pieces can become lodged in the uterus, cervix, and vagina, causing severe pain, hemorrhage, infection, and more.
Paragard is also associated with device migration. This can lead to injury when the IUD migrates out of its intended position and into surrounding tissue. In rare cases, it can also result in a life-threatening condition called ectopic pregnancy.
Paragard works by creating a hostile environment that prevents sperm from fertilizing the egg. However, like all IUDs, it is not 100% effective at preventing pregnancy. Even a slight migration of the device can reduce its contraceptive abilities, allowing sperm to pass by and fertilize the egg. If the fertilized egg implants outside the uterus (typically in a fallopian tube), it can result in an ectopic pregnancy. This is a serious condition that can cause internal bleeding and death.
Who Is The Lawsuit For?
The Paragard IUD lawsuit is for any patient who received a Paragard IUD and experienced breakage of the device before or during its removal by a healthcare professional. The Paragard IUD must have been removed 10 years or less after its implantation, and patients must have suffered injuries due to the breakage.
Who Is Eligible For The Paragard IUD Lawsuit?
To qualify for the Paragard IUD lawsuit, you must meet several requirements. While every case is different and you should consult with an attorney to discuss your particular case, qualification standards generally include:
- You must have been implanted with a Paragard IUD by your healthcare provider.
- You must have experienced breakage of the IUD before or during its removal.
- You must have been injured as a result of the device breakage.
- The Paragard IUD must have been removed 10 years or less after its implantation.
Qualifying personal injuries due to the Paragard IUD include:
- Organ perforation or damage caused by broken pieces of the Paragard IUD
- Excessive internal bleeding resulting in severe blood loss
- Pregnancy complications, including ectopic pregnancy
- Infections, including pelvic inflammatory disease and sepsis
- Complications and injuries related to IUD migration or breakage
Other injuries that may qualify you for the lawsuit are:
- Organ damage
- Internal bleeding and life-threatening blood loss
- Perforated uterus or cervix
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- Infertility and pregnancy issues, including ectopic pregnancy
- Pain
- Menstrual bleeding or spotting
- Increased pain from menstrual cramps
- Pain during intercourse
- Infections
- Vaginal discharge
- Expulsion of the IUD from the uterus
Do I Have to Pay for an Attorney?
If you are considering joining the Paragard lawsuit after being injured by your IUD, you may be wondering about the costs of hiring an attorney. The good news is that most lawyers working on the Paragard lawsuit do not require payment upfront.
Rather, they work on a contingency fee basis, which means your attorney is paid a percentage of your compensation only if you win your case. This makes it possible for patients to retain legal counsel despite budget constraints, giving those affected the best chance of securing justice. Your lawyer can help if you have other questions about legal fees and how to pay them.
Lawsuit Time Limits
Called the statute of limitations, factors like the state you live in, when you discovered your injury, and more will define when you must file your claim. An attorney can determine which time limits apply to you and help you compile strong evidence to build a solid case before the deadline.
Paragard IUD attorneys are standing by to speak with you about whether you may qualify for the lawsuit. Fill out the form at the top of the page to speak with a lawyer in the OCA network who will guide you on your journey to justice.
Add Comment