nav-logo
  • Home
  • Lawsuits & Settlementsdropdown
    • Type of Lawsuits
    • All Lawsuits
    • Defective Products
    • Cancer Lawsuits
    • Corporate Lawsuits
    • Workplace & Employment
    • Personal Injury Lawsuits
    • Data Breach Lawsuit
  • Class Action News
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌

‌

  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌

‌

  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
  • ‌
‌
‌
‌

‌

‌
‌
‌
‌
‌

‌

‌
‌
‌
‌
‌

‌

‌
‌
‌
‌
‌

‌

‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
footer-logo

Lawsuits & Settlements

View All SettlementsLatest Class Action NewsAbout Us

Subscribe

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on cases and settlements.

error

Failed To Sign Up

Please enter your email address below

success-modal

Thanks for Subscribing!

Thanks for signing up. We'll send you className action news, updates and trending lawsuits to keep you up-to-date.

By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy and provide consent to receive updates from our company.

© 2024 OnlyClassActions. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceConsumer Health Data Privacy Policy

Cookie Consent

FacebookInstagramTwitter
Dupixent Product Image

Dupixent Lawsuit

Did you develop cancer after using the biologic drug Dupixent? You may be entitled to compensation if you've used Dupixent and developed T-Cell Lymphoma. Sign up today to learn more about the lawsuit.

  • Cancer Lawsuits

Last Update

  • December 22, 2025
lawsuitlike
lawsuitlike
lawsuitlike

On This Page

  • Dupixent Lawsuit Updates
  • About the Dupixent Lawsuit
  • Understanding Dupixent and Its Medical Uses
  • Who Qualifies For The Dupixent CTCL Lawsuit?
  • Biologic Therapy Risks: Cancer and Dupixent Misdiagnosis
  • The Legal Accusations Surrounding Dupixent
  • How Do I Join The Lawsuit?

Dupixent Lawsuit Updates
image_line

Lymphoma Risk Claims Emerge as Dupixent Use Expands in Europe

Several studies have reported an increased incidence of lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system, among patients using Dupixent. Individuals diagnosed with lymphoma, along with surviving family members, have filed lawsuits against manufacturers Regeneron and Sanofi, alleging the companies failed to adequately disclose this potential risk. While litigation continues in the United States, European health authorities have expanded approved prescribing guidelines, permitting Dupixent use for patients aged 12 and older with chronic spontaneous urticaria, a condition defined by persistent hives without a known cause.

12/03/25

Dupixent Seeks New Approval Amid Ongoing Cancer Risk Litigation

The medication Dupixent (dupilumab) may soon receive FDA approval for treating allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), following study results showing it reduced the need for steroids in half of participants. While the drug is a leading treatment for eczema and related conditions, its use is associated with an elevated risk of T-cell lymphoma, a cancer with symptoms similar to eczema. Patients who developed lymphoma after taking Dupixent are filing lawsuits, alleging the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about this serious potential side effect.

11/14/25

Sanofi's Q3 Earnings Soar on Dupixent Sales Amid Growing Safety Litigation

Sanofi has reported a significant 26.2% increase in its third-quarter earnings, largely driven by sales of its blockbuster drug, Dupixent. While the drug is a major commercial success, its expanding use has correspondingly increased patient exposure to potential severe side effects. Emerging studies and adverse event reports have linked Dupixent to an elevated risk of lymphoma, leading to a growing number of lawsuits filed against Sanofi by patients who allege they developed cancer after taking the medication.

11/04/25

Tennessee Mother Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Dupixent-Linked Lymphoma

A Tennessee mother, Chandra Richardson, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Sanofi-Aventis and Regeneron on behalf of her deceased daughter. The complaint alleges that Dupixent injections caused the daughter to develop T-cell lymphoma, which ultimately resulted in her death. The lawsuit seeks compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and emotional injuries, asserting that the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential cancer risk associated with the medication.

10/17/25

About the Dupixent Lawsuit

Once hailed as a breakthrough for conditions like eczema, asthma, and nasal polyps, Dupixent (dupilumab) is now in the spotlight for a darker reason. Dupixent users are coming forward with assertions that the allegedly defective drug caused or worsened their cancers, particularly cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Many of these patients are now filing lawsuits against Sanofi Genzyme and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals in hopes of holding the medication’s producers accountable. 

 

People who used Dupixent or dupilumab and were later diagnosed with an eligible cancer (or experienced worsening of a pre-existing cancer) are encouraged to speak with an experienced attorney to understand their legal options. If you believe you or a loved one may qualify, You can fill out the sign-up form at the top of this page for a no-cost case evaluation. 

 

Understanding Dupixent and Its Medical Uses

Dupixent (generic name dupilumab) is a biologic injectable medication intended to treat a variety of long-term conditions, including: 

  • Moderate to severe eczema, also known as atopic dermatitis 
  • Asthma
  • Nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Prurigo nodularis

 

These diseases are all associated with increased inflammation in the body. Dupixent and dupilumab work primarily by blocking proteins involved in the inflammatory process, particularly interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13).

 

The medication was designed as a different method of treatment for these chronic conditions. Unlike many traditional treatments, Dupixent does not require daily doses; instead, the drug is typically injected just once a week, or even less frequently. 

 

This dosing schedule may appeal to patients wishing to spend less time on disease management. However, a wave of lawsuits says this convenience could come at the price of patients’ health.

 

Who Qualifies For The Dupixent CTCL Lawsuit?

You may be eligible to file a Dupixent dupilumab lawsuit if you meet the following requirements: 

  • You used Dupixent (or generic dupilumab), and
  • You were later diagnosed with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL, also known as mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome), or
  • You experienced a resulting worsening of your pre-existing cancer

 

You may also qualify if you were diagnosed with another type of T-cell lymphoma or any of the following CTCL subsets: 

  • Lymphomatoid papulosis
  • Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma
  • Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma
  • Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma
  • Primary cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma

 

Biologic Therapy Risks: Cancer and Dupixent Misdiagnosis

Dupixent was reportedly marketed as a safe and convenient treatment option, but recent litigation claims this might not have been the case. Plaintiffs say the injectable drug is associated with serious health effects, including Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL), a type of cancer. 

 

Allegedly, Dupixent may increase a patient’s risk of developing CTCL and may also worsen pre-existing cases. Backed by research, these claims reputedly aren’t without merit. Some studies correlate dupilumab use with anywhere from a 300% to 350% greater chance of developing lymphoma. The assertions don’t end there. 

 

CTCL is a rare form of cancer in its own right, which can sometimes lead to a delay in diagnosis. Worse, the cancer misdiagnosis lawsuit states, CTCL symptoms (such as itchy and painful skin rashes or plaques) can overlap with those of atopic dermatitis, one of the main illnesses Dupixent is prescribed to treat. 

 

Because of this symptom overlap, some plaintiffs say neither they nor their doctors were alarmed by their evolving conditions, allegedly preventing a timely CTCL diagnosis. Reportedly, the symptoms instead received an erroneous eczema misdiagnosis, allowing their cancers to go dangerously unnoticed or worsen as they continued using Dupixent. 

The Legal Accusations Surrounding Dupixent

For patients suffering from eczema, asthma, and nasal polyps, the search for reliable treatment options can feel like a lifelong uphill battle. Dupixent’s 2017 FDA approval brought hope to those wishing for a different type of therapy. 

 

According to plaintiffs, the medication was marketed by Sanofi and Regeneron to doctors and patients alike as an effective, low-risk drug. Dupixent advertisements reportedly showed happy, clear-skinned people in relaxing social settings, free from any obvious signs of debilitating health problems. The medication is approved for use by patients 6 months old and up, apparently further contributing to its safe appearance.

 

However, the Dupixent lymphoma lawsuits state that the biologic drug is not as safe as represented by Sanofi and Regeneron. Further, plaintiffs claim that the companies should have reasonably known about Dupixent’s cancer risks yet failed to adequately warn patients and doctors. This purported negligence allegedly contributed to the suffering of patients whose cancers developed or worsened in response to the medication.

 

As of September 2025, Dupixent has not been recalled and is still being actively marketed by both Big Pharma companies.

 

How Do I Join The Lawsuit?

No one should have to face cancer for simply attempting to manage their chronic health condition. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after using Dupixent, you deserve justice. 

 

The best way to seek accountability from pharmaceutical giants like Sanofi and Regeneron is by exercising your legal rights. Working with a qualified Dupixent attorney can give you the greatest chance at a successful lawsuit. If you believe you meet the eligibility requirements,  complete the sign-up form on this page to be connected with a lawyer in the OCA network. Your case evaluation is confidential and available at no cost to you. 

 

While considering filing a lawsuit, you may have concerns about the cost of hiring legal counsel. At OCA, we believe your financial situation should have no bearing on your ability to pursue justice. That’s why attorneys in our network typically work on a contingency fee basis, meaning no upfront payment is required. In most cases, a plaintiff would pay a portion of any potential Dupixent settlement or compensation only if their case is successful. 

 

Our team of professionals is here to answer any questions you have about filing a Dupixent lawsuit and is standing by to support you on your legal journey. 

On This Page

  • Dupixent Lawsuit Updates
  • About the Dupixent Lawsuit
  • Understanding Dupixent and Its Medical Uses
  • Who Qualifies For The Dupixent CTCL Lawsuit?
  • Biologic Therapy Risks: Cancer and Dupixent Misdiagnosis
  • The Legal Accusations Surrounding Dupixent
  • How Do I Join The Lawsuit?
Search icon

Related Lawsuits

Woman watering plants outdoors, representing potential Roundup exposure during gardening

Roundup Class Action Lawsuit: Is Your Weed Killer Killing You?

May 13, 2024 /

151

4

67

Paraquat class action lawsuit for Parkinson's disease

Another Harmful Weed Killer? Paraquat’s Toxic Chemical Lawsuit

May 13, 2024 /

47

0

39

Cancer Litigation Learn More About Lawsuits

Cancer And Corporate Greed: The Fight For Justice In A Toxic World

January 28, 2025 /

12

1

4

PFAS water contamination lawsuit and health risks

PFAS Tap Water Contamination Across The United States

September 16, 2024 /

14

0

3

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Lawsuits have been filed against drug manufacturers Regeneron and Sanofi regarding their biologic medication Dupixent (dupilumab). Plaintiffs claim the drug caused or worsened their cancers, referencing studies that may show a correlation between Dupixent and increased cancer risk. The lawsuits state that Regeneron and Sanofi did not adequately warn patients of Dupixent’s risks.

Dupixent is a biologic injectable prescribed as an eczema (atopic dermatitis), asthma, and nasal polyps treatment. The drug may also be used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), eosinophilic esophagitis, and prurigo nodularis. 

According to the litigation and, reportedly, several research studies, Dupixent is associated with an increased risk of cancer, particularly Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL). The medication is also allegedly linked to a worsening of pre-existing cancers. 

You may qualify if you took Dupixent and went on to develop cancer, especially CTCL. You could also be eligible if your cancer worsened after using Dupixent. The best way to determine your eligibility is by speaking with an attorney, like those in the OCA network. You can fill out the sign-up form on this page for a free case evaluation.

No, but the lawsuits may be consolidated under the multidistrict litigation (MDL) if the litigation continues to grow. A Dupixent MDL could potentially offer a better opportunity for compensation.

This is an advertisement. OnlyClassActions is not a law firm or referral service, and we do not provide legal advice. OnlyClassActions provides a free service for individuals seeking legal representation, and we do not charge you to be connected with an attorney. We do not recommend or endorse any attorneys that pay to participate. OnlyClassActions utilizes a pool of attorneys in each jurisdiction, and attorneys are selected through a round-robin process without our evaluating your legal situation when selecting which attorney will receive your information. OnlyClassActions makes no representation about the quality of legal services or the qualifications of any attorney participating in our pool. Information you submit will be shared with third-party attorney(s). An attorney-client relationship is not formed when you submit information through the form. Hiring a lawyer is a critical decision and should not be predicated solely on comments, advertisements, or other content found on any website. You are under no obligation to retain a lawyer who contacts you through this service.

Add Comment