Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Updates
Court Sets Parameters for Bellwether Case Selections
During the sixteenth case management conference, Judge Campbell provided preliminary guidance on selecting the initial bellwether cases. The Court indicated a preference for six cases: three involving infections, two involving thrombosis, and one involving device fracture. The proposed mix also includes four cases related to polyurethane devices, one Groshong catheter case, and one involving a silicone device. At least one case must include surgical complications. This structure aims to ensure a representative sample of claims and assist in evaluating potential liability. The parties were directed to meet, finalize their proposed selections, and submit response memoranda by the following day.
High-Strength Claims in PowerPort Litigation
Some of the most compelling lawsuits involve individuals implanted with a BardPort or AngioDynamics Port within the past ten years who suffered complications such as device fracture, leakage, or migration. These malfunctions have led to serious medical conditions including infections, blood clots, and pulmonary embolisms, often requiring surgical removal. Claims are especially strong where the device caused severe outcomes such as sepsis, endocarditis, cardiac complications, hematomas, hemorrhaging, vascular lacerations, necrosis, or perforation of organs or tissue. Cases involving surgical intervention due to these issues present a particularly strong basis for liability in the ongoing litigation.
Bard Port MDL Bellwether Dispute
In the Bard Port Catheter MDL, both sides submitted bellwether trial proposals, agreeing to include three infection cases, one thrombosis case, and jointly selecting the Miller case involving a polyurethane catheter and thrombosis injury. Disagreement centers on fracture cases and catheter materials. Plaintiffs seek two fracture cases to reflect key placement differences relevant to design and warning claims, while defendants argue for limiting trials to polyurethane catheters, which make up 75% of the inventory. The dispute highlights differing views on whether trials should represent a broad injury range or focus on the most statistically common cases.
Judge Sets Key Deadlines in Case Management Order
Judge Campbell has issued a new Case Management Order outlining critical deadlines for the ongoing litigation. Defendants must submit expert reports by May 23, 2025, with plaintiffs’ rebuttal reports due by June 20, 2025. All depositions must be completed by August 22, 2025, and motions to exclude expert testimony are due in September 2025. Additionally, both parties are required to meet and confer by April 21, 2025, to discuss the selection of bellwether plaintiffs. These deadlines ensure structured progress in the case.
About The Bard PowerPort Lawsuit
The Bard PowerPort is a medical device used for patients needing frequent intravenous treatments. The device has been linked to serious complications in many patients. The port is designed to provide easy access to medication, fluids, and blood draws. However, many patients have reported suffering from severe injuries when the Bard PowerPort malfunctions, such as infections, breaks, or migrations.
If you or a loved one has suffered from complications related to a Bard PowerPort, you may be entitled to compensation. Participating in the Bard PowerPort lawsuit can help you seek justice and hold the manufacturers accountable.
What Companies Are Involved?
C.R. Bard, the manufacturer of the PowerPort, is being sued for failing to properly warn patients and medical professionals about the risks associated with the port device. Many lawsuits claim that Bard was aware of the potential dangers but continued to market and sell the product to the healthcare facilities and patients without adequate safety warnings.
As more cases emerge, the fight for accountability is growing stronger. If you or a loved one has suffered from Bard PowerPort complications, you may be eligible to participate with others who are seeking justice and compensation.
Who Qualifies for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?
To participate in a Bard PowerPort lawsuit, you’ll need to meet certain conditions, such as:
- Implant of a Bard Powerport.
- Provide medical records showing that you received the port as a part of a medical treatment.
- Have medical documentation to connect your health problems to the PowerPort.
You may also be eligible if you have suffered from the following injury(ies):
- Blood Clots
- Cardiac Arrhythmia or Symptoms similar to a heart attack
- Cardiac Punctures
- Cardiac/pericardial Tamponade
- Migration due to breakage
- Hemorrhage/Hematoma
- Leakage at the port site
- Laceration to blood vessels
- Necrosis (Dead Tissue)
- Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
- Severe and Persistent Pain around the port/catheter
- Catheter Break (Into two or more pieces)
- Fracture (Remains one piece, no separation)
- Fractured pieces became embedded in the artery/organ.
- Fracture with pieces that broke apart and passed through the heart.
- Infection with the removal of the catheter.
- Blood Clots with Immediate Removal of Port.
- Death
We encourage you to seek legal advice to determine your eligibility. Various factors impact eligibility, and all cases are unique.
How Much Compensation Can You Expect in a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?
The settlement amount in a Bard PowerPort lawsuit can vary depending on several factors:
- The severity of your injury from the port.
- Strength of your evidence showing the port is to blame for your health-related problems.
Determining a typical settlement amount in a Bard PowerPort lawsuit can be a complicated process. At this point, Bard PowerPort lawsuits are still in the early stages, and no global settlements or jury trials have taken place. Many factors influence each case. These factors include the severity of the complications, the strength of the medical evidence, jury decisions, and the expertise of your legal team.
It's time to act now, if you or a loved one has experienced health complications due to a Bard PowerPort. Contact us today to learn more about your options and whether you may qualify to join the lawsuit. Seeking justice can not only provide you with potential financial compensation, but also hold the manufacturers accountable for the harm caused.
Add Comment