As of March 2025, the AngioDynamics litigation has progressed with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) overseeing the consolidation process. The JPML has established a multidistrict litigation (MDL) to streamline claims related to defective vascular access ports. In February 2025, six new lawsuits were added to the MDL, with an increase to 24 cases by March. This rise reflects growing concerns about the devices' safety. Plaintiffs allege that AngioDynamics' vascular access ports were defectively designed, leading to severe complications such as blood clots, infections, and catheter fractures requiring surgical intervention. The litigation seeks accountability and fair compensation for those affected.
A new lawsuit has been filed against AngioDynamics and Navilyst Medical on behalf of a deceased Virginia woman, alleging that her Vortex port catheter caused a severe infection requiring surgical removal. The lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to disclose the high failure rates of these devices, leading to serious complications. Filed on February 6, the case joins multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Southern District of California. Plaintiffs argue the Vortex port was defectively designed, making it susceptible to degradation, migration, and infections. As cases consolidate, Judge Jinsook Ohta is expected to establish bellwether trials to assess key evidence, potentially influencing future settlements or individual trials.
A new case management order permits plaintiffs to directly file lawsuits against AngioDynamics in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, where defective port catheter cases are consolidated in multidistrict litigation (MDL). This process aims to expedite litigation by eliminating delays from case transfers. Plaintiffs allege the port catheters were defectively designed, leading to fractures, infections, and migration within the body. As the number of claims grows, Judge Jinsook Ohta is expected to establish bellwether trials to assess key evidence. While not binding, these trials may influence potential settlements or lead to individual trials if no resolution is reached.
Litigation against AngioDynamics, Inc., and Navilyst Medical, Inc., continues to grow. In October 2024, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated lawsuits into MDL No. 3125 in the Southern District of California under Judge Jinsook Ohta. Plaintiffs claim the Xcela port degrades and fractures, causing infections, blood clots, and migration due to its high barium sulfate content. A recent lawsuit alleges a 2020 implantation led to severe complications, requiring removal in 2021. The plaintiff claims permanent injuries, financial losses, and emotional distress, alleging the manufacturers failed to warn of these risks.
Lawsuits are mounting against AngioDynamics regarding its Xcela port catheter devices. More than 60 patients have sued the medical device company for allegedly concealing device defects that resulted in serious injuries. As affected port catheter users continue to come forward, courts have chosen to consolidate the cases into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Port catheter devices provide easy vascular access for patients with chronic conditions requiring long-term treatment. Devices like AngioDynamics’ Xcela are designed to administer chemotherapy, blood transfusions, antibiotic therapy, intravenous fluids and nutrition, and more. Many affected patients were already struggling with serious health problems before receiving what they alleged is a defective device—making the impact that much greater.
If you or a loved one were impacted by an AngioDynamics Xcela port catheter, you may be able to assert your legal rights in a lawsuit. Learn about qualifying injuries and how to take the first step to see if you can join the lawsuit today.
Plaintiffs claim that AngioDynamics Xcela port catheter devices have inherent design flaws, causing them to easily fracture, migrate, and promote infection. These complications can result in painful and even life-threatening problems for patients, such as damage to vital organs, blood clot formation, sepsis, and improper medication delivery.
Claims against AngioDynamics related to its Xcela port catheters include:
The allegations against AngioDynamics are similar to those made against C.R. Bard, Inc. relating to its Bard PowerPort implantable catheters.
Experts state the manufacturing process and device material are to blame for the safety concerns surrounding Xcela port catheters. To ensure visibility on radiographs, AngioDynamics designed the devices with a high concentration of barium sulfate, a radiopaque substance. This resulted in a brittle material prone to fracture inside patients’ bodies, allowing broken pieces of the catheters to flow through the bloodstream and into organs like the heart and lungs.
The manufacturing process also resulted in a rough and irregular catheter surface that allows fibrin and biofilm to accumulate, facilitating blood clots and infections. Patients who suffer damage from the catheters often require corrective surgery, resulting in additional pain, health risks, financial strain, and psychological impacts.
The AngioDynamics Xcela MDL is for any patient who received a qualifying Xcela port catheter and later suffered complications due to the device. Patients should be able to provide evidence related to their injuries, including medical records, imaging reports, doctor’s notes, and other relevant documentation, which can be obtained from their healthcare providers. Financial records like bank statements, hospital bills, and proof of lost wages can also be helpful in proving economic impact. Every case is different, and you will need to speak with an attorney to understand your ability to assert a claim and seek damages.
To join the AngioDynamics lawsuit, you must meet a few requirements, such as:
Several complications may prequalify you to join the AngioDynamics Xcela lawsuit, including:
Defective AngioDynamics devices that may prequalify you for the lawsuit include:
If you are unsure which Xcela port catheter device you received, you should contact your doctor. He or she can provide you with medical records confirming your device model.
If you meet the above requirements, you may be entitled to assert a claim and seek compensation. We encourage you to seek legal advice to determine your eligibility. Various factors impact eligibility, and all cases are unique.
If you are considering joining the AngioDynamics Xcela lawsuit, you may be curious how much it costs to work with an attorney. It’s important to understand that many lawyers who handle these cases never ask for payment upfront. Most of the time, MDL attorneys require payment only if your case is successful. If you win your case, you pay a percentage of your settlement amount; otherwise, payment is not required. This is called working on a contingency fee basis, and it ensures all patients impacted by AngioDynamics’ defective devices can seek justice. Your lawyer can answer any questions you have about legal fees and how they are paid.
The deadline to file a lawsuit depends on what state you live in, when your injury was discovered, and more. A lawyer can determine the specific deadlines that apply to you after reviewing your case.
Though the AngioDynamics Xcela lawsuit is still in its early stages, it’s important to act quickly by speaking to an attorney. Doing so will allow you and your legal team enough time to gather the evidence needed to build a strong case. It also allows you to participate in bellwether trials and negotiations that have the potential to shape settlement amounts.
Attorneys are standing by to assist you with the AngioDynamics Xcela port catheter lawsuit. Complete the form at the top of the page now to connect with a lawyer in the OCA network who can help you evaluate and secure your legal rights.
This is an advertisement. OnlyClassActions is not a law firm or referral service, and we do not provide legal advice. OnlyClassActions provides a free service for individuals seeking legal representation, and we do not charge you to be connected with an attorney. We do not recommend or endorse any attorneys that pay to participate. OnlyClassActions utilizes a pool of attorneys in each jurisdiction, and attorneys are selected through a round-robin process without our evaluating your legal situation when selecting which attorney will receive your information. OnlyClassActions makes no representation about the quality of legal services or the qualifications of any attorney participating in our pool. Information you submit will be shared with third-party attorney(s). An attorney-client relationship is not formed when you submit information through the form. Hiring a lawyer is a critical decision and should not be predicated solely on comments, advertisements, or other content found on any website. You are under no obligation to retain a lawyer who contacts you through this service.
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on cases and settlements.
Add Comment